img

img

welcome to Temple

In the Fall, we told you about a proposed development at 2304-2310 N Broad St., the home of the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College from 1968 until 1982. At the time, the buildings were in a terrible state of disrepair, and demolition was just getting underway.

In bad shape

Despite the horrible condition of the buildings, you could tell that they were once quite beautiful, part of a thread of gorgeous residential architecture on this part of North Broad Street.

Brownstones across the street

Also across the street. Wow.

Regrettably, many older buildings on Broad Street have been lost over the years and others have been modified beyond recognition. In addition, Temple, in building out its campus over the past few decades, has replaced some classic architectural specimens with regrettable postmodern buildings that resemble public housing. Not Temple’s fault really, just a a function of the time during which much of this construction took place.

It’s true, the new buildings on this site do not bring PHA to mind, but considering the new and green Norris Apartments nearby, we kind of wish they did. Check out the new buildings on this site, still under construction.

That's what we've got

It’s true that these buildings are unimpressive, but they’re not offensive to the point that we would feel compelling to bring them to your attention in a vacuum. The problem that we have with the buildings is that they are a) replacing once beautiful buildings that had impressive and irreplaceable architectural details and b) on a stretch where there are many other gorgeous buildings. We’re not suggesting that the developers should have saved the buildings that were here before, nor would we suggest that they try to replicate the demoed buildings. But couldn’t they have, at the very least, tried a little harder with their designs, considering the context of Broad Street?

Just sayin’.

10
COMMENTS
img
Posted in Temple | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments
  • Eat Me

    wow why couldnt they save the original buildings?  They looked beautiful in the pics!  Cost I’m guessing?  Shame.

  • Chris

    might as well have put up a metal shed, has about the same appeal.  would a cornice or some/any decorative feature have been that expensive… I generally dislike bays, but that would at least give some character to the buildings.

  • Philly Tipster

    I would hesistate to say that this building was “designed” since there is no visual indication that anyone attempted to do anything to make this thing look appealing.  Why are builders/developers so against a cornice?  Doesn’t have to be fancy or ornate, but I’m tired of these flat box facades with nothing to top it off!

  • Vieux Pays

    I’m pretty sure the developer is a former Temple football player who may have played in the NFL a year or two and is now involved in real estate.

  • http://twitter.com/F1rstCitizen First Citizen

    Yuck.

  • guest

    Bad information on developer, just look at address used on BRT and you will see car lot owner who has built a ton in area.

  • Guest

    North Broad Street was developed by WASPS in the 19th Century — people with taste and sophistication who cared about how their community looked.  Now, most developers are animals who care only about making money and nothing about the community.

  • Seth Trance

    Anybody see the great article in CityPaper about the development in this area? Pretty good and depressing at the same time. This area has no chance. http://www.citypaper.net/ There is no community group even trying to oversee it from what I understand. It’s beyond me why the government doesn’t have a good design board to prevent this from happening. Oh that’s right…upfront money is the only thing that matters, not future benefits. That would be impossible to see.

  • Seth Trance

    Anybody see the great article in CityPaper about the development in this area? Pretty good and depressing at the same time. This area has no chance. http://www.citypaper.net/ There is no community group even trying to oversee it from what I understand. It’s beyond me why the government doesn’t have a good design board to prevent this from happening. Oh that’s right…upfront money is the only thing that matters, not future benefits. That would be impossible to see.

  • steve

    All of you are funny. It’s the developers fault for buying old shitty properties that haven’t been taken care of in years and building something new. You are all the same people that complain that there’s old rundown crack houses on your block then when someone knocks it down and builds something new your the first to complain about it. It’s funny

Have a Story for us?
Email Tips@Nakedphilly.com
With Photos & gossip